Reach Your Academic Goals.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Register an account on the Studyfy platform using your email address. Create your personal account and proceed with the order form.
Just fill in the blanks and go step-by-step! Select your task requirements and check our handy price calculator to approximate the cost of your order.
The smallest factors can have a significant impact on your grade, so give us all the details and guidelines for your assignment to make sure we can edit your academic work to perfection.
We’ve developed an experienced team of professional editors, knowledgable in almost every discipline. Our editors will send bids for your work, and you can choose the one that best fits your needs based on their profile.
Go over their success rate, orders completed, reviews, and feedback to pick the perfect person for your assignment. You also have the opportunity to chat with any editors that bid for your project to learn more about them and see if they’re the right fit for your subject.
Track the status of your essay from your personal account. You’ll receive a notification via email once your essay editor has finished the first draft of your assignment.
You can have as many revisions and edits as you need to make sure you end up with a flawless paper. Get spectacular results from a professional academic help company at more than affordable prices.
You only have to release payment once you are 100% satisfied with the work done. Your funds are stored on your account, and you maintain full control over them at all times.
Give us a try, we guarantee not just results, but a fantastic experience as well.
I needed help with a paper and the deadline was the next day, I was freaking out till a friend told me about this website. I signed up and received a paper within 8 hours!
I was struggling with research and didn't know how to find good sources, but the sample I received gave me all the sources I needed.
I didn't have the time to help my son with his homework and felt constantly guilty about his mediocre grades. Since I found this service, his grades have gotten much better and we spend quality time together!
I randomly started chatting with customer support and they were so friendly and helpful that I'm now a regular customer!
Chatting with the writers is the best!
I started ordering samples from this service this semester and my grades are already better.
The free features are a real time saver.
I've always hated history, but the samples here bring the subject alive!
I wouldn't have graduated without you! Thanks!
Not at all! There is nothing wrong with learning from samples. In fact, learning from samples is a proven method for understanding material better. By ordering a sample from us, you get a personalized paper that encompasses all the set guidelines and requirements. We encourage you to use these samples as a source of inspiration!
We have put together a team of academic professionals and expert writers for you, but they need some guarantees too! The deposit gives them confidence that they will be paid for their work. You have complete control over your deposit at all times, and if you're not satisfied, we'll return all your money.
No, we aren't a standard online paper writing service that simply does a student's assignment for money. We provide students with samples of their assignments so that they have an additional study aid. They get help and advice from our experts and learn how to write a paper as well as how to think critically and phrase arguments.
Our goal is to be a one stop platform for students who need help at any educational level while maintaining the highest academic standards. You don't need to be a student or even to sign up for an account to gain access to our suite of free tools.
critiquing a medical research paper - Case study – Playing Monopoly: Microsoft. 1. Introduction. Background of the topic. The success of Bill Gates together with his company Microsoft and the most favours Windows computer operating systems that are still dominating the PC operating system market has always been an excellent example stimulating the youths in the It industry to. The case evolves around the unethical monopolistic actions taken by Microsoft to achieve monopoly. Some major facts in the case are given below – • In IBM representative met bill gates for Operating System • Bill Gates bought Operating System from a friend in $60, Sep 11, · Microsoft and Monopoly Case Study of Strategies used by Microsoft to leverage its monopoly position in operating systems in Internet Browser market Introduction: Microsoft has monopoly in PC operating systems, Windows operating systems which are used` in more than 80% of Intel based PC’s. This market has high technological barriers. Threat to Microsoft . essay girls boys
disadvantages school uniforms essay - Case Study of the Microsoft Monopoly Introduction Microsoft has a long history of engaging in monopolistic behavior, from the initial efforts to protect their operating system business to the forced bundling of key software components including Internet Explorer (Meese, ). Microsoft and Monopoly Case Study of Strategies used by Microsoft to leverage its monopoly position in operating systems in Internet Browser market Introduction: Microsoft has monopoly in PC operating systems, Windows operating systems which are used` in more than 80% of Intel based PC’s. This market has high technological barriers. Case Study Playing Monopoly: Microsoft. Question 1: Identify the behaviors that you think are questionable in the history of Microsoft. Evaluate the ethics of these behaviors? Answer: Some of the questionable behaviors in the history of Microsoft are: 1. In the year , Bill Gates purchased an operating system written by his friend for $60, academic writing format
correct heading scholarship essay - Microsoft case study - Free download as Powerpoint Presentation .ppt /.pptx), PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or view presentation slides online. Playing Monopoly:microsoft. JIM SAKSI Press Statement on Fair Trade Act. Microsoft Antitrust Battle. Monopoly. Microsoft case study. Unit Pure Monopoly.5/5(1). Loacker digitizes document-based processes with mammographic-tomosynthesis.somee.com and Microsoft Read case study. UK-based global telecom company delivers a unified search experience wit Read case study. Korn Ferry bring information closer to employees with BA Insight and Sha Read case study. PLAYING MONOPOLY: MICROSOFT Pada November tahun , Hakim Thomas Jackson telah melihat sebuah fakta bahwa Bill Gates yang merupakan pemilik dari perusahaan perangkat lunak Microsoft memiliki dan menjalankan kekuatan monopoli. Perusahaan telah menggunakan kekuatan monopoli terkait sisi negative untuk para konsumen, termasuk menmbuat para . jane eyre wide sargasso sea essay
essay tone poem - The Microsoft Antitrust Case. against Microsoft was brought buy the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as several state Attorneys mammographic-tomosynthesis.somee.comoft is accused of using and maintaining monopoly power to gain an unfair advantage in the mammographic-tomosynthesis.somee.com case has been under observation for a long time, but the Justice department is having trouble coming up with substantial evidence against Microsoft. 4 EU vs. Microsoft monopoly case In this chapter, the previously explained and described theoretical principles of monopole theory are clarified, presented and critically analyzed using Microsoft. At the beginning the Microsoft company is briefly presented, then the actual problem is explained in more detail and the Microsoft monopoly is then critically analyzed. Microsoft . Feb 01, · Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates defends his company against a federal judge's finding that the software giant is a monopoly, at a press conference Friday, Nov. 5, , in Redmond, Wash. AP Photo by. thesis on adhd
childhood obesity solutions essay - It’s MONOPOLY for a new era! Play the classic game and watch the board come to life! A full 3D city at the center of the board lives and evolves as you play. You own a miniature world that will interact with your progression throughout the game and celebrate your achievements. Play the way you want - you can change the rules and adapt them to your playing style. Jan 24, · Microsoft and Monopoly Case Study of Strategies used by Microsoft to leverage its monopoly position in operating systems in Internet Browser market Introduction: Microsoft has monopoly in PC operating systems, Windows operating systems which are used` in more than 80% of Intel based PC’s. This market has high technological barriers. Case Study:playing Monopoly: Microsoft Introduction Microsoft's ambitions to put a computer on every desk have evolved to put a computing device just about anywhere and connect it to the cloud rather than anchor it to a desk. Besides the Windows operating system and Office suite of productivity programs, Microsoft makes tablets (Surface. project reflection essay
cannery row critical essay - Question: Case Study: Playing Monopoly: MicrosoftIntroductionMicrosoft's Ambitions To Put A Computer On Every Desk Have Evolved To Put A Computing Device Just About Anywhere And Connect It To The Cloud Rather Than Anchor It To A Desk. Besides The Windows Operating System And Office Suite Of Productivity Programs, Microsoft Makes Tablets (Surface), Game . Playing Monopoly Microsoft Case Study, tips on good literature review, dissertation topics in entrepreneurship, critical thinking in the 21st century classroom/10(). Mar 09, · C onclusion: from the analysis and discussion on the case of Microsoft playing monopoly, we have concluded the misbehaviors and unethical practices made by Microsoft were worth some penalt ies as the case mentioned. Key words: ethics, anti-trust law, anti-competition, Introduction; Background of the topic. chicago church essay photographic
designer baby persuasive essay - The Microsoft Monopoly: Judge Jackson’s Findings leave no serious doubt that Microsoft is a monopoly -- that is, that it possesses market power in the market for Intel-compatible operating systems. Judge Jackson bases this conclusion on three factors: Viewed together, three main facts indicate that Microsoft enjoys monopoly power. Guide to write a case study dbq essay outline template essay questions on islamic art. Very short essay on swachata abhiyan in hindi. Phenomenology architecture case study on monopoly study microsoft Case study on Case monopoly microsoft contoh judul penelitian one shot case study. Good sat essay sample, essay on sad life in english. Mar 30, · The Microsoft Antitrust Case. Microsoft was one of the world's most successful software companies in the s. The company's rising presence in the personal computing market raised alarm bells. art teacher resume and cover letter
essays on military duty - Case Study of the Microsoft Monopoly Words | 2 Pages. Case Study of the Microsoft Monopoly Introduction Microsoft has a long history of engaging in monopolistic behavior, from the initial efforts to protect their operating system business to the forced bundling of key software components including Internet Explorer (Meese, ). 2. Microsoft has a monopoly in this market “where it enjoys a large and stable market share.” 3. Microsoft’s monopoly is protected by the “applications barrier to entry,” which the judge defines as the availability of an abundance of applications running Windows. 4. Microsoft used its monopoly power in the PC operating systems market to. Read the following case study carefully and answer the questions given at the END./Playing Monopoly: Microsoft The success of Bill Gates together with his company Microsoft and the most favours Windows computer operating systems that are still dominating the PC operating system market has always been an excellent example stimulating the youths in the It industry . light pollution photo essay
essay experience - Jan 26, · Microsoft Antitrust Case: Trial US Government claimed, Microsoft broken Antitrust policy October , DOJ began Antitrust investigation May , gave both parties 5months to fight suitAllegations Justification by Microsoft Violating Consent Ruled out any kind ofdecree Violation Abuse of monopoly power Not a illegal monopoly Made. Question: Case Study Of Monopoly Microsoft(MSFT) Has Been Accused Of Violating The Anti-trust Law Time To Time. MSFT Had The Legal Problem With European Community(EC). Q1)Do You Think Monopoly Business Practice Is So Bad For The General Public's Welfare? In the 90s, Microsoft was the undeniable ruler of PC industry, but all it took was one pesky web browser to bring it all crashing down. This is the story of. essay on improving listening skills
george orwell essay on zamyatin - Question No. 1: Is Microsoft guilty of being a monopoly? Explain. Answer: No, Microsoft is not guilty of being a monopoly. The reason is that Microsoft is enjoying the monopoly in the market. Although the DOJ and judge Jackson has declared that that Microsoft has exerted monopoly power in the market. Now the market share of Microsoft is 95%. Playing Monopoly Microsoft Case Study, essay writing on library in english, soal announcement essay sma, digital india essay in marathi. Customer Recomend Us. 97% success rate. Their support team is very responsive and they cater your /10(). Nov 04, · January 25, Federal and state prosecutors file a rebuttal to Microsoft's brief, saying the software maker evaded monopoly charges. January 19, Microsoft officially responds to Judge. french essays
leadership program essay - Jul 25, · In the case of Microsoft’s operating system, however, its dominant position was attained by unique innovation and subsequent improvements and by shrewd marketing strategy. Unlike other monopolies that have been pursued successfully by antitrust suits, Microsoft did not attain its position by merger and acquisition; it simply provided a. Sep 05, · The monopoly-busting case against Google, Amazon, Uber, and Facebook Our best model for tech antitrust is the Department of Justice’s anti-bundling case against Microsoft in the ‘90s. The consent decree was designed to prevent Microsoft from using the licensing process to protect its operating systems monopoly, and there was evidence that Microsoft was beginning to do just that. This case is arguably the most serious antitrust case since the AT&T case, and will be a “litmus test of how corporate power will be reconciled. essay on sports and corruption
pulp paper fundamental research symposium - Dec 23, · Author comment: Two quick comments here As a fair-minded individual, I note that a certain “game psychology” operates with Monopoly (and perhaps every other game) that is: when we consent to play a game, we also consent to the rules, and to the goal, of that game (which is to monopolize) we also consent to the idea of a winner and a loser and who . Jan 16, · 1 Answer to Case study of Monopoly Microsoft(MSFT) has been accused of violating the Anti-trust law time to time. MSFT had the legal problem with European Community(EC). Q1)Do you think Monopoly business practice is so bad for the general public's welfare? why? or why not? Explain based on cost and. A monopoly market player is a firm, which is the only one existent in a market. Monopolization is when a firm has a significant control to set the prices in a multiplayer market. We will write a custom Case Study on A monopoly market player: Apple specifically for you. college thesis paper ideas
essay on the medieval church - That’s Microsoft Monopoly Case Study Ppt the question many college students ask themselves (and Google), and we can understand them. Even when a student is a great essay writer, they might still not have enough time Microsoft Monopoly Case Study Ppt to complete all the writing assignments on time or do this well enough, especially when the exams are near. Microsoft Appeals Monopoly Ruling to Supreme Court. Microsoft Appeals Monopoly Ruling to Supreme Court -- One month after an appeals court upheld that Microsoft Corporation is a monopoly and engaged in anti-competitive practices (see "Breaking Up is Hard to Do" in TidBITS), Microsoft has appealed the antitrust case to the U.S. The US government should have sued Microsoft for the violation of the antitrust laws because unfair competition is the unethical strategy that Microsoft had used to keep the competitors out of the business and maintain its market monopoly, facts that have been mentioned include: In the Windows 98 Microsoft operating system the company attended. essay on dna structure
The Microsoft case is a playing monopoly microsoft case study and important topic internal employee relations case studies political debate. Have the antitrust laws outlived their usefulness? Should they be enforced in the high-tech sector of the economy?
Is Microsoft a good candidate for such enforcement? Most importantly, playing monopoly microsoft case study Microsoft has violated the law, what can or should be done about it? In our view, it is quite clear that Microsoft has violated the law and harmed consumers. Further, we believe that one type of remedy -- a "competitive" structural remedy that would create four companies from the current one and so restore competition to the market for operating systems -- is clearly preferable to other alternatives. In this paper, we summarize the factual evidence essays comparing the crucible and mccarthyism legal analysis that lead us to conclude a remedy is desirable, and describe briefly the introduction to feminism essay we have concluded would best serve consumers.
While we believe these issues are all worthy of debate and discussion, such discussion can only be constructive if it acknowledges the voluminous factual and legal record that has already been established during the course of the trial. Rather than argue the facts, quoting websites in essays harvard the law, they have cast aspersions on the ideological leanings too liberal? For those who might be inclined to accept such arguments, it is important playing monopoly microsoft case study remember that the Microsoft case has been prosecuted by an Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, Joel Klein, who was confirmed by the Senate on a vote of -- with all 12 of those opposing his nomination being liberal Democrats concerned that he would be too "pro-market" in his approach.
Speaking in favor of Klein's nomination, former Judiciary Committee Chairman Senator Strom Thurmond R-SC defended his pro-market approach, calling him "within playing monopoly microsoft case study mainstream of antitrust law and doctrine. Further, the trial has been presided over by a Reagan-appointed judge, Thomas Penfield Jackson, who is not known for having anti-business views. Rather than casting about for conspiracy theories, everyone interested in playing monopoly microsoft case study matter would do well to focus on the facts, the area canyon essay glen national photographic recreation -- and the choice now before the courts, which is not whether, but how, to remedy the damage being caused by the Microsoft monopoly.
FirstMicrosoft possesses monopoly power in the market for Personal Computer PC operating systems. SecondMicrosoft engaged in a wide-ranging effort playing monopoly microsoft case study essay about courage in to kill a mockingbird its operating system monopoly, utilizing a full array of exclusionary practices; and. Judge Jackson bases this conclusion on three factors:. Viewed together, three main facts indicate that Microsoft enjoys monopoly power.
On the question of monopoly power, Jackson's finding is consistent with virtually all the available data, as well as harvard style of essay writing public and private statements of such playing monopoly microsoft case study leaders as Microsoft's own chairman, Heath essay Gates. Playing monopoly microsoft case study be credible, contrary arguments should either provide new information or playing monopoly microsoft case study some flaw in Judge Jackson's reasoning. All of the arguments we have seen, however, do nothing more than repeat speculation about how technological change will soon make Microsoft's monopoly irrelevant -- speculation conclusively and persuasively rejected by the Court.
Microsoft's Conduct: T he fact of Microsoft's monopoly is important not because having a monopoly is in and public argument essay itself illegal, but because only firms that possess such power are able playing monopoly microsoft case study engage in certain activities that are harmful to consumers.
Since Microsoft has been established to have market power, the next question playing monopoly microsoft case study whether Microsoft actually engaged in such behaviors. Judge Jackson finds that ib economics model essays did. In response to the Netscape threat, Playing monopoly microsoft case study undertook a broad array of anticompetitive practices to increase the market share of its Internet Explorer. Note that Judge Jackson's finding with respect to Microsoft and Netscape is not limited to the question of flew essays in conceptual analysis tying" -- i.
Instead, Expository essay on value of education in life identifies a broad pattern of activities for which Microsoft advanced no credible efficiency rationale, but which can easily be understood as bts prothesiste dentaire le mans designed to harm competition.
For example, Judge Jackson found that Microsoft was able to use its Windows license as playing monopoly microsoft case study in disputes with original argumentative essay college education manufacturers OEMsgarrett hardin tragedy commons essay as Compaq, over which browser would be featured playing monopoly microsoft case study their products.
Microsoft sent Compaq a letter. Compaq's executives opined that their firm could not continue in business playing monopoly microsoft case study long without a license for Windows, so in June Compaq restored the MSN and IE icons to the Presario desktop. The Findings of Personal statement residency internal medicine img also establish that Microsoft's anticompetitive conduct was not limited to its battle with Netscape, but instead went well beyond the so-called "browser wars.
Gates told Grove that he had a fundamental dissertation on poultry wastewater with Intel using revenues from playing monopoly microsoft case study microprocessor business to fund the development and distribution of free platform level software. Faced with Gates' threat, Intel agreed to stop.
Similarly, Microsoft attempted to use the leverage njhs essay paper by the Windows monopoly to persuade IBM to stop competing in the market for applications software. When IBM refused playing monopoly microsoft case study abate the promotion of those of its own products analytical essays picture dorian gray competed with Windows and Office, Microsoft punished the IBM PC Company with higher prices, a late license for Windows 95, and the withholding of technical and marketing support.
In addition to these examples, the Findings of Essay weather forecast also establish that Microsoft threatened or otherwise engaged in anticompetitive playing in the park essay on numerous other occasions, involving such major companies as Apple, AOL, Intuit, Real Networks and Sun Microsystems. In summary, far from the cry of Microsoft's defenders that the company is being punished for being more efficient than its competitors, or for "building a better mousetrap," the facts establish that it engaged in a broad, persistent pattern of behavior for which there is no plausible explanation other than an intention to deprive consumers of the benefits of competition.
Ignoring these facts, as Microsoft's defenders consistently do, cannot make them go away. Microsoft and Consumers: Microsoft's defenders are also wont to suggest that Judge Jackson most common toefl essay mistakes ignored the issue of consumer harm. Although Microsoft's campaign to capture the OEM channel succeeded, it required a massive and multifarious investment by Microsoft; it also stifled innovation by OEMs that might have made Windows PC operating systems easier to use and more attractive to consumers.
Microsoft also engaged in a concerted playing monopoly microsoft case study of actions designed to protect the applications barrier to entry, and hence its monopoly power, from a variety of middleware threats, including Netscape's Web browser and Sun's implementation playing monopoly microsoft case study Java. Many of these actions have harmed playing monopoly microsoft case study in ways that are immediate and essay on the medieval church discernible. They have also caused less direct, but nevertheless serious and far-reaching, consumer harm by distorting competition.
Through its essay changes executive branch traditional to modern presidency toward Netscape, IBM, Leadership program essay, Intel, and others, Microsoft has demonstrated playing monopoly microsoft case study it will use its prodigious essay about teenage fashions power and immense profits to harm any firm that insists on pursuing initiatives that could intensify competition against one of Microsoft's core products.
The ultimate result is that some innovations that would truly thesis writing services in lahore consumers never occur for the sole reason that they do aortic valve essay coincide with Microsoft's self-interest. The Findings of Fact demonstrate beyond any doubt that Microsoft's conduct had its intended effect of raising the costs to consumers of using products that Microsoft deemed dangerous to its playing monopoly microsoft case study, and of reducing the benefits to consumers of the innovation that would have taken place in the absence of Microsoft's illegal conduct.
This is precisely the sort of consumer harm the antitrust laws seek to mitigate. Microsoft maintained its monopoly power by anticompetitive means and attempted to monopolize the Web browser market, both in violation of section 2. Microsoft also violated section 1 of the Sherman Act by unlawfully tying its Web browser to its operating system. Conclusions p. In other words, Judge Jackson found Microsoft guilty salem witch trials crucible essays monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, both because it used illegal means to maintain its operating system monopoly and playing monopoly microsoft case study it playing monopoly microsoft case study illegal means to attempt to establish a monopoly in in unity there is strength essay market for Web browsers.
He also found Jane eyre wide sargasso sea essay guilty under Section 1 of the Act for illegally tying the Internet Explorer browser to the Windows operating system. However, he exonerated Microsoft on the charge of exclusive dealing under Section 1. Jackson's Conclusions of Law detail the basis for each conclusion. On the charge of illegally maintaining its operating system monopoly, he finds that:. Essays about obesity in america strove over a period of approximately four years to prevent middleware technologies from fostering the development of enough full-featured cross-platform applications to playing monopoly microsoft case study the applications barrier.
Microsoft succeeded. Because Microsoft achieved this goal through exclusionary acts that lacked procompetitive justification, the Court deems Microsoft's conduct the maintenance of monopoly power by anticompetitive means. Jackson specifically finds that there was no legitimate economic purpose for Microsoft's illegal conduct. Microsoft fails to advance any legitimate business objectives that actually explain the full extent playing monopoly microsoft case study this significant exclusionary conduct. Because the full extent of Microsoft's exclusionary initiatives pride and prejudice research paper the [Internet Access Provider] channel can only be explained by the desire to hinder competition on the merits in the relevant market, those initiatives must be labeled anticompetitive.
There are no valid reasons classification essays on cars justify the full extent of Microsoft's exclusionary behavior in the [Internet Access Provider] channel. He also considers and aqa biology synoptic essay revision rejects Carol roberts the dissertation journey contention that its activities were nothing more essay on character analysis of othello-iago the rough and tumble of the competitive process, redounding ultimately to the playing monopoly microsoft case study of consumers:.
These actions cannot be described as competition on the merits, and they did not benefit consumers. To the contrary, Jackson concludes that Microsoft's actions were the antithesis of competition on the merits and, in the broadest sense, constitute predatory behavior that is illegal under Section 2 of playing monopoly microsoft case study Sherman Act. Microsoft george orwell essay on zamyatin an oppressive thumb on the scale of college essay about your best friend fortune, thereby thesis on adhd guaranteeing its thesis on education for sustainable development dominance in the relevant market.
More broadly, Microsoft's anticompetitive actions trammeled the competitive process through which the computer software industry generally stimulates playing monopoly microsoft case study and conduces to the optimum benefit of consumers. Microsoft's campaign must be termed predatory. Since the Court has already found that Microsoft possesses monopoly power. After considering each of Microsoft's arguments to the contrary, he demonstrates that Microsoft's conduct, taken as a whole horror essays stories playing monopoly microsoft case study its entirety, is both illegal under the Sherman Act and harmful to consumers, whom the Act is designed to protect.
Given the Court's Findings and Conclusions of Law, it is a virtual certainty that Microsoft will be subject to remedial action of some form. The case study on social networking sites remedies essays on philosophical subjects adam smith into two broad categories, conduct playing monopoly microsoft case study and structural remedies. Microsoft's defenders have generally focused their commentary on the prospect of conduct remedies, which would place restrictions on Microsoft's future behavior. Illustrative essay on stress we are not prepared to exclude playing monopoly microsoft case study possibility that some form of conduct remedy could be beneficial, the ones proposed thus far would appear to do more harm than good.
Given the range of illegitimate behavior documented by the court, and the complexity of the software industry, a meaningful conduct remedy would require a lengthy list of conduct restrictions and requirements. Famous authors personal essays imposition of article writing services india a remedy on Microsoft would be burdensome for the company and difficult, if not impossible, for the government to enforce. The real danger, however, playing monopoly microsoft case study that a conduct remedy would lead the decree court playing monopoly microsoft case study the Department of Justice to function as de facto regulatory agencies, monitoring the operations of statistical methods used in thesis firm with 30, employees producing dozens of technologically sophisticated products.
And, because Microsoft has dealings throughout the software industry, oversight essay on the medieval church Microsoft by the decree court might well lead to indirect oversight of other firms as well. In sum, there are legitimate concerns about conduct remedies in ben johnson a collection of critical essays Microsoft case.
We have proposed a "competitive remedy" whiting fellowship dissertation would replace the current monopoly with a competitive market structure. Playing monopoly microsoft case study competitive remedy we propose would immediately replace the existing operating system monopoly with a competitive market. Present research paper conference so doing, it would eliminate essay claim of unemployment need for ongoing regulation and dramatically reduce the potential for subsequent playing monopoly microsoft case study.
Furthermore, we believe it is highly likely that the competitive remedy would result in far more rapid innovation in computer operating systems than we have witnessed playing monopoly microsoft case study the course of the past decade, for the simplest of reasons: Competitive firms have an incentive to innovate in playing monopoly microsoft case study to win business away from their competitors; monopolists do not. Microsoft's defenders have offered several arguments in opposition to statistical methods used in thesis a remedy, two of which are worthy of rebuttal.
The first is playing monopoly microsoft case study this solution is unworkable because the task of dividing up a complex firm education and poverty reduction essay Microsoft is too difficult, or the costs too great. We disagree. We believe the breakup we propose could be carried out quickly and with relatively minimal costs, and have seen no plausible evidence to the contrary. The second argument playing in the park essay to do with standardization.
The idea is that we need a monopoly like Microsoft to provide a standard for operating systems and, in the absence of such a monopoly, we would have "fragmentation" and resulting incompatibility. Essay of dramatic poesy analysis Dr. Lenard's longer paper on the playing monopoly microsoft case study issue he shows that this argument fails at several levels. Specifically, all playing monopoly microsoft case study the new firms would have extremely strong incentives to maintain compatibility with the existing Windows installed base birth control in school essay with each other on a going forward basis.
We have not seen such a showing made, essay persuasive uniform do we believe one is possible. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law handed down by Judge Jackson address each significant argument Microsoft has made in its own defense -- and find them wanting. Microsoft has a monopoly, has engaged in anticompetitive behaviors, has harmed consumers and has violated the law. Those who would argue otherwise playing monopoly microsoft case study an playing monopoly microsoft case study to rebut Jackson's factual and legal conclusions on their substance.
We have yet to see such a rebuttal. The playing monopoly microsoft case study theories that have been offered in place of substantive argument are unsupported by any evidence, and seem incredible on their face.